> but certain things may not be writen down and published
and who decides what can be written down and published? ruling party? the “president”? country-wide referendum? therein lies an issue, once you say “we can’t write or publish ____” you open yourself up to a whole lot of problems. your heart is in the right place but there cannot ever be anything (literally anything) that can’t be written down or published. if there is, that will eventually be weaponized to prevent writing and publishing what is dear to your heart. freedom is a bitch… :)
while I cant quite articulate exactly how I would impliment safeguards for minors or vulnerable persons, I strongly belive that rights and responsibilitys must be intrinsicly linked and that society can never drop it's guard against the cunning and clever types who cause the worst harms.
And as it stands, someone who is convicted of harming children, is encarcerated and then perhaps has requirements to "register" etc, ie: loose rights and freedoms, is it realy so far to suggest that we will have certain taboos?, but at the same time have inner city free for all zones where concenting adults can get as freeky as phisiology will permit.
and who decides what can be written down and published? ruling party? the “president”? country-wide referendum? therein lies an issue, once you say “we can’t write or publish ____” you open yourself up to a whole lot of problems. your heart is in the right place but there cannot ever be anything (literally anything) that can’t be written down or published. if there is, that will eventually be weaponized to prevent writing and publishing what is dear to your heart. freedom is a bitch… :)