> How is dating websites being lopsided in favor of women misogyny?
I did not claim that.
> The systemic use of the blanket term of misogyny in these cases seems more like misandry, to be fair.
Why?
> Why not stay on the point?
What is the point? I thought you were implying that the author believing that women were favored by dating websites was a counter to the claim that the site was a torrent of misogynistic screed. If so, I refuted that. If not, you were unclear, but if you wish to be clear about your point, I am happy to stay on it.
> You can't control of tone of Heartiste. He has the right to express his opinions, don't you think?
Absolutely, and I have the right to express opinions about his expression of his opinions. Free speech is truly a wonderful thing!
> How is dating websites being lopsided in favor of women misogyny?
I did not claim that.
> The systemic use of the blanket term of misogyny in these cases seems more like misandry, to be fair.
Why?
> Why not stay on the point?
What is the point? I thought you were implying that the author believing that women were favored by dating websites was a counter to the claim that the site was a torrent of misogynistic screed. If so, I refuted that. If not, you were unclear, but if you wish to be clear about your point, I am happy to stay on it.
> You can't control of tone of Heartiste. He has the right to express his opinions, don't you think?
Absolutely, and I have the right to express opinions about his expression of his opinions. Free speech is truly a wonderful thing!