Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It doesn't exactly follow the recommendations in the second link from the post: http://gadgetopia.com/post/6346


Yes and that is why the linked post and this post itself are bad. Both authors do not understand the principles of an URI in the context of the web.

To a client, the URI should be opaque. If a client has to start to make meaning of the contents of an URI, the server loses the ability to change its implementation (or just move resources around).

Edit: Ah, its the same author for both blog posts. That explains it.


From the same page:

(And yes, I know Gadgetopia’s URLs are somewhat lame in this regard. There are reasons why I did it, but changing it now - See more at: http://gadgetopia.com/post/6346#.dpuf)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: