Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Enigma (2001) is a better film.

I haven't seen that, but my understanding is that they cast him as straight. If so, how is it possible to get past that (rather insulting) inaccuracy?

All German units sent in a strength return each day (all serious armies do this) which reads like "#1, 12000, #2, 450 ..." and is simply many effective soldiers, how much ammo, and other basic numbers. It's dull, boring, and tells which units can fight effectively and how far they can move. Much of Bletchley Park's work was decrypting and tabulating that info, which told Allied commanders where the weak spots were on the German side.

Can't believe that there wasn't a glut of bogus strength reports floating around. ("No, Mr. Turing, your friends will find that the 14th Panzer is fully armed and operational.")



They didn't cast Turing at all, it was a historical fiction movie about a guy named Tom Jericho who sort of fills Turing's role. The historical context is mostly accurate, but it's not supposed to be a movie about Turing.


The point is that the Ultra secret was so well kept that the Germans didn't know their ciphers were broken. They had no reason to send fake strength reports.


Both Allies and Axis simultaneously were reading the other sides coded messages whilst think that their ciphers were secure.

It was an interesting sort of psychosis.


The point is, they had little reason not to.


Nothing particularly prevents disinformation from reaching your own side. The more obvious it is that a channel is "false", the less likely you are to fool the enemy, but the more "real" the channel is the more likely you are to fool yourself. A study of the history of war will show armies generally have a hard enough time inculcating themselves with cultures that will prevent them from deliberately lying to themselves as it is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: