This reminds me of another comment I had: I personally find the phrase "syntactic sugar" irritating. As used, I don't feel like it adds anything to the blog post. IMO you could write nothing there and it'd make the exact same point.
What exactly is the "syntactic sugar" that hides the idea that names can have addresses? Structs? Some specific kind of expression? Array index syntax? The names themselves?
What exactly is the "syntactic sugar" that hides the idea that names can have addresses? Structs? Some specific kind of expression? Array index syntax? The names themselves?