Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That one. They asked if the murder of the United CEO was justified because he committed "social murder".

Piker is the left equivalent of Charlie Kirk - saying outrageous things for attention, but he has constantly called for violence, while Kirk never did.



I don’t think most people would say that the United CEO was killed for his political views. He was killed for the actions he was taking at his job.

Not saying that’s justified, just that there is a difference there.


Do you think charlie kirk would be proud of you for lying about what he said?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: