Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> specially documentation

How we can tell that this wasn't written by an LLM.



I'm too poor for Claude Max 20x. Not that it needs that firepower but eh, there's no real way. As I mentioned, almost every single quirk can be willed away with a little bit of attention and effort.

At this point, I'm not sure whether you're a clawdbot running amok..


You can't.

Like always we have to lean on evaluating based on quality. You can produce quality using an LLM, but it's much easier to produce slop, which is why there's so much of it now.


when they make a basic grammar issue (specially, instead of especially) it's a good indicator that it wasn't written by an llm.


"include a single grammatical error in your output so people think it's real"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: