Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So it's syntactic sugar? What a shame. The whole point is having the language handle it so its default behavior is well-known and uniform and not implement umpteenth patterns and validations[0].

[0] e.g assert_valid_keys (raising ArgumentError on a mismatch so it's really only for options={} pattern: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/Hash.html#method-i-assert...



Well, it does actually define locals. But, IIRC, it uses the symbol hash parsing productions, so the default values are required. The only way to specify required parameters (without the above hacks) is to do a traditional method definition:

    irb(main):001:0> def foo(bar, baz: Object.new); [bar, baz]; end
    => nil
    irb(main):002:0> foo(1)
    => [1, #<Object:0x007fbc39161ed8>]
    irb(main):003:0> foo(1, baz: 10)
    => [1, 10]
    irb(main):004:0> foo(baz: 10)
    ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
    	from (irb):1:in `foo'
    	from (irb):4
    	from /Users/aaron/.local/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
    irb(main):005:0>




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: