> GPT‑5.3-Codex was co-designed for, trained with, and served on NVIDIA GB200 NV...

uh_uh · 2026-02-05T18:24:10 1770315850

How so?

Philpax · 2026-02-05T18:25:29 1770315929

They're on shaky ground right now https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-...

kingstnap · 2026-02-05T18:27:29 1770316049

Its kind of a suck up that more or less confirms the beef stories that were floating around this past week.

In case you missed it. For example:

Nvidia's $100 billion OpenAI deal has seemingly vanished - Ars Technica

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-...

Specifically this paragraph is what I find hilarious.

> According to the report, the issue became apparent in OpenAI’s Codex, an AI code-generation tool. OpenAI staff reportedly attributed some of Codex’s performance limitations to Nvidia’s GPU-based hardware.

dajonker · 2026-02-05T19:58:09 1770321489

There was never a $100 billion deal. Only a letter of intent which doesn't mean anything contractually.

esafak · 2026-02-05T18:43:20 1770317000

> OpenAI staff reportedly attributed some of Codex’s performance limitations to Nvidia’s GPU-based hardware.

They should design their own hardware, then. Somehow the other companies seem to be able to produce fast-enough models.

sumedh · 2026-02-06T10:02:11 1770372131

> They should design their own hardware

They made a deal with Cerebras for fast inference.