Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Some AGI definition variables I see:

Is it about jobs/tasks, or cognitive capabilities? The majority of the AI-valley seems to focus on the former, TFA focuses on the latter.

Can it do tasks, or jobs? Jobs are bundles of tasks. AI might be able to do 90% of tasks for a given job, but not the whole job.

If tasks, what counts as a task: Is it only specific things with clear success criteria? That's easier.

Is scaffolding allowed: Does it need to be able to do the tasks/jobs without scaffolding and human-written few-shot prompts?

Today's tasks/jobs only, or does it include future ones too? As tasks and jobs get automated, jobs evolve and get re-defined. So, being able to do the future jobs too is much harder.

Remote only, or in-person too: In-person too is a much higher bar.

What threshold of tasks/jobs: "most" is apparently typically understood to mean 80-95% (Mira Ariel). Automating 80% of tasks is different to 90% and 95% and 99%. diminishing returns. And how are the tasks counted - by frequency, by dollar-weighted, by unique count of tasks?

Only economically valuable tasks/jobs, or does it include anything a human can do?

A high-order bit on many people's AGI timelines is which definition of AGI they're using, so clarifying the definition is nice.



Not only tasks, but you need to look at the net effect

If it does an hour of tasks, but creates an additional hour of work for the worker...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: