Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Young people spend alot of time on tick tock. At the level of detail that social media companies can get, they can estimate fairly accurately what issues that people get concerned by, and their opinions. Then they can micro target individual subpopulations with messaging that particularly works at influencing them.

This is very different than historical propaganda efforts, were one had to target the largest common denominator.

Now you can send individualized messaging towards individual subgroups. You see some of this with politicians in the US saying one thing in a set of Facebook adds, while saying the opposite in another set. Because the ads are targeted, neither group sees the ads meant for the other group, Which allows for better tailoring of message.

On top of this the goal of a theoretical Chinese propaganda campaign is not necessarily to send a particular message, but to polarize and divide the country to make it even more disfunctional.



Exactly. That's the fundamental difference between historical influence and modern social media influence.

Historically, the same entity didn't have profiles, the ability to microtarget, and content.

Can you imagine a newspaper company that kept a profile on every household? And also repasted together a unique paper for each one?

Now the largest social media companies can do that trivially.


Like you say it's US politicians doing this. That's my point, I don't care if China does it as well because my current government is fully engaged in as much propaganda as they can get away with.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: