And even when it is technically right it often goes off on tangents not in the paper -- for instance I fed it one of my papers on a pipeline to analyze microbiome data and it spent half of the "podcast" on talking about how important the microbiome is to health and how health care needs to take the microbiome in mind. All true, but it doesn't have to do with the pipeline! That being said, I'm blown away by how realistic the voices are and how they often interrupt and talk over each other the way that real human podcasters do.