I thought I read 33kb somewhere in there. If so, by dynamodb standards, that's n... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		encoderer on Jan 23, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Tarsnap won't use DynamoDB I thought I read 33kb somewhere in there. If so, by dynamodb standards, that's not a small item. If I mis-attributed that 33kb number, then I kindly retract what I said :D

cperciva on Jan 23, 2012 [–]

I have 33kB blocks which are stored on S3 (after aggregating them into objects of up to 8 MB). I have key-value pairs which are 24 bytes and 53 bytes long.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact