Understanding 50% of the brain, whatever that would even mean, is an utter fantasy.
I am not suggesting that we are anywhere near having a complete analytical model of 50% of the brain.
I am suggesting that we do have tools to continue answering questions about functional aspects of the brain.
Or am I missing something that indicates the non-utility of “function analysis” of biology-based artificial neural networks?
Understanding 50% of the brain, whatever that would even mean, is an utter fantasy.