A lot of the modern American progressive argument presupposes the validity of its own assumptions. It's entirely circular logic.
> oppose a policy which intends to decrease [inequality]
Of course, there is very little discussion on whether said policies do actually end up decreasing inequality; much like how the Great Society "War On Poverty" arguably increased poverty.
> oppose a policy which intends to decrease [inequality]
Of course, there is very little discussion on whether said policies do actually end up decreasing inequality; much like how the Great Society "War On Poverty" arguably increased poverty.