Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What is the "revolutionary battery checklist" meme comment?


This one I presume:

----------------------------------------------------------------

Dear battery technology claimant,

Thank you for your submission of proposed new revolutionary battery technology. Your new technology claims to be superior to existing lithium-ion technology and is just around the corner from taking over the world. Unfortunately your technology will likely fail, because:

[ ] it is impractical to manufacture at scale.

[ ] it will be too expensive for users.

[ ] it suffers from too few recharge cycles.

[ ] it is incapable of delivering current at sufficient levels.

[ ] it lacks thermal stability at low or high temperatures.

[ ] it lacks the energy density to make it sufficiently portable.

[ ] it has too short of a lifetime.

[ ] its charge rate is too slow.

[ ] its materials are too toxic.

[ ] it is too likely to catch fire or explode.

[ ] it is too minimal of a step forward for anybody to care.

[ ] this was already done 20 years ago and didn't work then.

[ ] by this time it ships li-ion advances will match it.

[ ] your claims are lies.

----------------------------------------------------------------


article actually seems to cover all this issues well (except maybe for ‘your claims are lies’), so I’m hopeful about this one.


>liquid-CO2 system has a round-trip efficiency of 75-80%

You mean this part?

Edit: this is pretty much theoretical Carno cycle and it has moving parts


I think even 60% efficiency would still be fine if the storage was cheap enough and scales well. Just build more solar cells or wind mills to compensate the inefficiency. Neither lithium-ion nor gravity based systems seem particularly scalable to me. So a good-enough system that’s scalable will be a winner in the long run I think.


That's for heat conversion, no? This isn't about heat.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: