Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't have the citations off hand, but

> my rate of thinking has decreased over time

from my neuro 2xx or 3xx courses, this is how it works: crudely, the young brain works faster because it takes into account less information, fewer contingencies, while the older brain does the opposite.



Does that really mean that the rate of thinking is slower though? I would say it just means that the rate of conclusions from all of the thinking might be slower.


Rate of conclusions per unit time sounds like something interesting. Say it takes you 3x longer to arrive at a conclusion than a peer. But, each of those conclusions is 10x more valuable to the product/organization/individual.

Perhaps we also say that some conclusions are bad and bring negative value. It is likely that hasty decisions fall into this camp more frequently than more careful considerations. Just one bad technology decision made flippantly can inflict critical damage.

It is way easier to sink a ship than it is to build a new one. "Slow" thinking is the fastest way when you zoom out to the strategic map.


Reminds me of an experiment where chimps outperform humans in speed with simple mental tasks.

https://www.nature.com/news/2007/071203/full/news.2007.317.h...


Fluid intelligence when younger, crystalized intelligence when older.

Analogize to basketball. Athleticism when younger, saavy when older.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: