Agreed. The bottom line is very clear: do not (directly) cause violent attack. The society is already bearing with them, they may even be able to indirectly cause violent attacks.
You can't expect everyone to love everyone. But violence is the red line.
How do you link (legally) hate speech (protected by constitution) -> “direct” violence -> individuals -> charges?
Haven’t seen evidence of that in any of these cases, by companies, MSM, legal parties, or honest people—- especially when looking at riots earlier in the year.
You can't expect everyone to love everyone. But violence is the red line.