How is it possible that a wiki page about a trial neglects to mention the outcome?
> The Circuit Court finally refused to admit the
complainant's testimony, and dismissed the bill with costs. An appeal
was taken, but withdrawn, on a settlement between the parties whereby
the complainant received her expenses, costs, and counsel fees. The
probate of the will of September I, 1863, therefore, remained undisturbed,
Not sure if this was added before or after your comments, but at the time I'm looking, the last scene sentence in the second to last paragraph of the intro is "The case was ultimately decided against Robinson after the court ruled that the clause invalidating future wills and Sylvia's signature to it were forgeries"
> The Circuit Court finally refused to admit the complainant's testimony, and dismissed the bill with costs. An appeal was taken, but withdrawn, on a settlement between the parties whereby the complainant received her expenses, costs, and counsel fees. The probate of the will of September I, 1863, therefore, remained undisturbed,
From https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?refere...
Which references as the original source:
> The American Law Review (vol. 4, pages 629-54)