>They've certainly hacked google in the past for example - see below.
You've referenced proof they couldn't hack Google and instead they had to use alternative measures.
>Google is understood to be working on "forward encryption" for its private network so that communications even over its private leased lines would be unintelligible to anyone without the "keys" to decrypt it.
That's basically the reason it was even possible. Such surveillance is not a hack.
You've referenced proof they couldn't hack Google and instead they had to use alternative measures.
>Google is understood to be working on "forward encryption" for its private network so that communications even over its private leased lines would be unintelligible to anyone without the "keys" to decrypt it.
That's basically the reason it was even possible. Such surveillance is not a hack.