No, it's not and discussing it like it is a thing is irrational. Ethics are based on morals and morals are based on determining a "right" course of action for a given act.
Just because something is legal, by absence of law, doesn't mean it's right or fair for all cases. Just because something is illegal (copyright) doesn't mean it's not right or fair for all cases. What if the information saved a million lives? Would it still be ethical to claim "ownership" of that information?
What if the information caused a target audience to visualize that thing over and over again? Is it right to allow that information out into the public at all?
Just because something is legal, by absence of law, doesn't mean it's right or fair for all cases. Just because something is illegal (copyright) doesn't mean it's not right or fair for all cases. What if the information saved a million lives? Would it still be ethical to claim "ownership" of that information?
What if the information caused a target audience to visualize that thing over and over again? Is it right to allow that information out into the public at all?
g'disable javascript in your browser'