Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

SGML's implied close tags are a pain in the ass though. End tags in XML are overly verbose, but at least they're required.


You control whether an element requires start- and end-element tags in your element declaration via "O" (letter O as in "omissible") in the respective tag omission indicator position:

    <!ELEMENT e - -(f,g,h)    -- no tag omission -->
    <!ELEMENT f O - (#PCDATA) -- start-tag omission -->
    <!ELEMENT g - O (#PCDATA) -- end-tag omission -->
    <!ELEMENT h O O (#PCDATA) -- both start- and end-
                                 tag omission allowed-->
What's painful about end-element tag omission?


Can't find the source, but vaguely remember this line from a Usenet or mailing list post, maybe by Tim Bray:

The lack of </> in XML is a crime against humanity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: