Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

California isn’t doing anything to anyone else. The sellers are making choices, and the market is doing what it does and allocating resources accordingly.


The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause disagrees with you.


How does it disagree? How do California’s state laws prevent a product from selling in other states?

The way interstate commerce clause is used is to give federal government ability to intervene, not another state government.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: