Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The one and only thing that you cannot do is offer a commercial version of CockroachDB as a service without buying a license.

How much a SaaS has to do to not be consider as selling CockroachDB as is?

These questions apart is worth noting that AWS can still copy CockroachDB APIs, rename it AWS Ants, and called it a day.



The "API" you are referring to is known as SQL, transmitted over the wire using the pgsql protocol. There's nothing to copy. The magic of Cockroach is in the implementation.


Not sure why they changed their license then. Doesn't AWS have already a Postgres-like database with RDS but also with DynamoDB?


Yes, it is indeed a little puzzling. CrB's biggest benefit is to people not interested in engineering their own scaling/sharing solutions for existing RDBMS options or if they care about optimal resource utilization (under a certain subset of conditions), neither of which are particularly draws for the AWS team. Perhaps they are more worried about other vendors.


> Doesn't AWS have already a Postgres-like database with RDS but also with DynamoDB?

They have actual managed Postgres with RDS for Postgres, and also a Postgres-compatible (SQL dialect and wire protocol) version of RDS Aurora.


That's what makes this even more puzzling. Is there demand for CRDB-flavored SQL features?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: