Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Stock trading is a dying business, and after the next stock market crash or recession, they will lose the majority of their customers.

Is there historical evidence to back this up on older brokers?

We've been in a ~10 year - largely unprecedented - bull market where you could throw darts and make money. Recessions usually destroy the returns of index funds and broad ETFs that millennials have been sold on. When the market's rising tide isn't raising every ship, picking ships becomes important.

If anything a recession should increase the number of retail traders because their index ETF is getting destroyed, but there are a handful of companies or positions that are flourishing. In the past, at least we've had advisors who while glorified salesman you can at least call and will get you to calm down. Now we're going to have a generation of retail investors watching their investments tank 20% across the board with only Robinhood support to tell them to calm down? Is that going to be enough to stop them from liquidating their ETF and taking a more active role investing in recession-safe companies?



Do you have any cites of any 10 year period when more than 50 percent of managed funds beat their respective indexes?


Beat, net of fees. The goal of almost any managed fund is to extract the maximum amount of depositor money via fees. If you beat the market, raise your fees. If you don't, say it's because your investments are counter cyclical and lower risk, and keep charging your fees.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: