This is an absurd misunderstanding of FR and biometric security. I am a lead developer of a leading FR system, and whomever is designing this deployment does not know what they are doing. First off, for public access, FR is not secure because it does not prevent someone being forced through FR security, and in some opinions will encourage such coercion. Extra measures are required for piggy-back access behind the FR enabled entry, and at that point you may as well have a minimum wage human security guard. FR for doorway access makes sense inside a secured space, but not for access to the secured space. The secured space needs to be completely enclosed, and have 3 passive biometrics collected or something such as a key or a human guard to access to the secured space for the creation of a secured space ready for FR within that space. Are they even at that level of security yet?