Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

However AGPL has it's own problems and a lot pf people like me walks straight away if anything is only available as AGPL.

Commons clause means the software works as liberal easy-to-use open source for 99.9% of us AFAIK.

Edit: is->us



> Commons clause means the software works as liberal easy-to-use open source

Common Clause is — by its own admission — not open source.


"works as ... open source" and "is ... not open source" are compatible statements. For instance, the handle of a screwdriver works as a hammer but is not a hammer.


You quoted half my sentence, making it much easier to refute my argument.

I think it is called a strawman.

Edit: as can be seen in my other posts I know it is not open source. As can be seen in their FAQ they know it as well.

Edit 2: attack me -> refute my argument.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: