I've met exactly 2 doctors who have actually used OpenEMR and they were both researchers. It is quite nice, but the last time I looked it wasn't trivial to set up and run. I think it one of those "it's free if you time is worth nothing" kind of things. And, there are some other EHRs out there that are nice and won't break the bank.
> there are some other EHRs out there that are nice and won't break the bank.
In fact, due to the various "pay for performance" models out there, a good EHR will make you money (making it easier to prove you are meeting various thresholds for the quality measures in question).
Yeah, quality measure reporting is key, the good ones do that well for sure. However I think they're missing the ability to monitor quality on a day to day and week to week basis for the most part. It's also really hard to track quality trends.
I'd be interested to hear more about what you think could be improved. In the vast majority of cases, new data points only occur during a patient visit. "Day to day" or "week to week" tracking aren't really useful in those cases, "visit to visit" is as good as you're going to get.
