By "manipulating media coverage", you mean "having a PR team that pitches stories"? Because virtually every company listed on the NASDAQ does that --- as does every company that has ever issued a press release.
I mean, hats off for a deft deployment of the assumptive close in your argument --- I don't really even understand what the arguments they're promoting are, let alone whether they're "terrible lies", but my point was pretty straightforward: the comment to which I replied singled out Monsanto as having a reputation for media manipulation, and if pitching stories is that, basically all major media companies are guilty as well. That's what PR groups do.
So, here's my issue with your comment and the mindset it betrays: rather than acknowledging that this is a serious issue that we should not take lightly, you do the opposite. You say, 'That' what PR firms do. They lie to help the company. Everyone does it.' We can get to everyone as we go, but it's time to start holding people accountable, rather than accepting it as the way it goes/is.
>Yesterday's groundbreaking news of a new lawsuit regarding Monsanto's collusion, cover ups, and corruption inside the EPA is a part of a long string of unraveling safety claims.
Decades of faulty chemical review procedures are beginning to be overturned. Last week, after years of asking, I received an email from the EPA confirming that the National Toxicology Program is currently reviewing glyphosate and glyphosate formulations.
>You're missing the point of the comment. The same company produces both products, and has a long history of manipulating media coverage in this manner.
^That's the original comment you replied to. We're talking about Monsanto's history of lying and manipulation through the media.
It seems like what you are doing is saying there's no basis to be concerned about monsanto's actions because everyone does it. That's not good enough, and not accurate about Monsanto. They are pretty much always acting as an overpowering bully. In one state, they are suing regulators who are concerned about the use of their chemicals in that state.
