Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That does not even nearly fit on one line, so I broke it up. Yeah, it looks pretty bad. Here's hoping it's only sparsely filled out.

State

Juriscode

Jurisname

CountyFIPS

MCD

CNTY

Town

Ward

Precinct

Ballotbox

PrecinctName

NamePrefix

FirstName

MiddleName

LastName

NameSuffix

Sex

BirthYear

BirthMonth

BirthDay

OfficialParty

StateCalcParty

RNCCalcParty

StateVoterID

JurisdictionVoterID

LastActiveDate

RegistrationDate

VoterStatus

SelfReportedDemographic

ModeledEthnicity

ModeledReligion

ModeledEthnicGroup

RegistrationAddr1

RegistrationAddr2

RegHouseNum

RegHouseSfx

RegStPrefix

RegStName

RegStType

RegstPost

RegUnitType

RegUnitNumber

RegCity

RegSta

RegZip5

RegZip4

RegLatitude

RegLongitude

RegGeocodeLevel

ChangeOfAddress

COADate

COAType

MailingAddr1

MailingAddr2

MailHouseNum

MailHouseSfx

MailStPrefix

MailStName

MailStType

MailStPost

MailUnitType

MailUnitNumber

MailCity

MailSta

MailZip5

MailZip4

MailSortCodeRoute

MailDeliveryPt

MailDeliveryPtChkDigit

MailLineOfTravel

MailLineOfTravelOrder

MailDPVStatus

MADR_LastCleanse

MADR_LastCOA

AreaCode

TelephoneNUm

TelSourceCode

TelMatchLevel

TelReliability

FTC_DoNotCall



As I said in the other thread, this is all public data from various sources (except the modeling). It will be fully filled out. It's very common for political orgs to have the entire voter file for the US (or be able to query it using SQL)


its the aggregation and easily searchable format for 2/3 of citizens that makes this REALLY dangerous for identity theft. they were still grossly irresponsible. no consequences will happen though.


It's already aggregated and easily searchable.

Seriously.

You could, in the next 10 minutes, go purchase a national voter file with all this info on 190 million plus voters.

Just Google "national voter file purchase".

Those are pre-aggregated, and honestly, really cheap (Usually ~2k).

You can also aggregate it yourself for less if you want.


Are you saying there's a $2k national voter file? Where?


He mentioned this in another thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14589057


Pardon my ignorance, what is the key data in this leak for identity theft? Eg, I didn't see anything really nasty like SSN, so what makes it easy for identity theft?

(not disagreeing, rather I'm seeking information)


Plus the supposedly "startlingly accurate" preference and views modeling that is linked to all personal details and publically accessible. While someone could always deny it being correct it again raises questions about responsibility in data collection.

> RNC_RegID, State, 2012ObamaVoter_DRA_12_16, 2012RomneyVoter_DRA_12_16, 2016ClintonVoter_DRA_12_16, 2016TrumpVoter_DRA_12_16, AmericaFirstForeignPolicy_agree_DRA_12_16 AmericaFirstForeignPolicy_disagree_DRA_12_16 AutoCompaniesShipJobsOverseas_agree_DRA_12_16 AutoCompaniesShipJobsOverseas_disagree_DRA_12_16 CorpReputs_AmericanMakers_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_DailyLives_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_Egalitarians_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_EnviroConscious_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_OpportunitySeekers_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_STEMSupporters_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_SupplyChainers_DRA_12_16, CorpReputs_Unifers_DRA_12_16, DemLeadersStandUpToTrump_DRA_12_16, DemLeadersWorkWithTrump_DRA_12_16, DParty_DRA_12_16, FinancialServicesHarmful_agree_DRA_12_16 FinancialServicesHarmful_disagree_DRA_12_16 FinServicesCompany_Dreamers_DRA_12_16 FinServicesCompany_RiskMitigators_DRA_12_16 FossilFuelsImportantForUSEnergySecurity_DRA_12_16 FossilFuelsNeedToMoveAwayFrom_DRA_12_16, InvestInfrastructure_agree_DRA_12_16, InvestInfrastructure_disagree_DRA_12_16, LowerTaxes_agree_DRA_12_16, LowerTaxes_disagree_DRA_12_16, NonReluctantDJTVoter_DRA_12_16, NonReluctantHRCVoter_DRA_12_16, PharmaCompsDoGreatDamage_agree_DRA_12_16, PharmaCompsDoGreatDamage_disagree_DRA_12_16, ReformGovtRegulations_agree_DRA_12_16, ReformGovtRegulations_disagree_DRA_12_16, ReluctantDJT_Above.5_DRA_12_16, ReluctantHRCVoter_DRA_12_16, RepealObamacare_agree_DRA_12_16, RepealObamacare_disagree_DRA_12_16 RParty_DRA_12_16, StopIllegalImmigration_agree_DRA_12_16, StopIllegalImmigration_disagree_DRA_12_16, TrumpStandUpToDems_DRA_12_16, TrumpWorkWithDems_DRA_12_16, USAFinancialSituation_Optimistic_DRA_12_16, USAFinancialSituation_Pessimistic_DRA_12


Formatted:

    RNC_RegID
    
    State
    
    2012ObamaVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    2012RomneyVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    2016ClintonVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    2016TrumpVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    AmericaFirstForeignPolicy_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    AmericaFirstForeignPolicy_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    AutoCompaniesShipJobsOverseas_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    AutoCompaniesShipJobsOverseas_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_AmericanMakers_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_DailyLives_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_Egalitarians_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_EnviroConscious_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_OpportunitySeekers_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_STEMSupporters_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_SupplyChainers_DRA_12_16
    
    CorpReputs_Unifers_DRA_12_16
    
    DemLeadersStandUpToTrump_DRA_12_16
    
    DemLeadersWorkWithTrump_DRA_12_16
    
    DParty_DRA_12_16
    
    FinancialServicesHarmful_agree_DRA_12_16 
    
    FinancialServicesHarmful_disagree_DRA_12_16 
    
    FinServicesCompany_Dreamers_DRA_12_16 
    
    FinServicesCompany_RiskMitigators_DRA_12_16 
    
    FossilFuelsImportantForUSEnergySecurity_DRA_12_16 
    
    FossilFuelsNeedToMoveAwayFrom_DRA_12_16
    
    InvestInfrastructure_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    InvestInfrastructure_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    LowerTaxes_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    LowerTaxes_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    NonReluctantDJTVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    NonReluctantHRCVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    PharmaCompsDoGreatDamage_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    PharmaCompsDoGreatDamage_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    ReformGovtRegulations_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    ReformGovtRegulations_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    ReluctantDJT_Above.5_DRA_12_16
    
    ReluctantHRCVoter_DRA_12_16
    
    RepealObamacare_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    RepealObamacare_disagree_DRA_12_16 
    
    RParty_DRA_12_16
    
    StopIllegalImmigration_agree_DRA_12_16
    
    StopIllegalImmigration_disagree_DRA_12_16
    
    TrumpStandUpToDems_DRA_12_16
    
    TrumpWorkWithDems_DRA_12_16
    
    USAFinancialSituation_Optimistic_DRA_12_16
    
    USAFinancialSituation_Pessimistic_DRA_12


How could one tell if a vote is "reluctant" or not, based on the available data?


Lots of ways. Perhaps you know they're a super-loyal Republican voter and you have things that correlate with that, such as willingness to vote when presented with an online poll. You might know they were reluctant because the person shifted between the available alternatives during primary season - perhaps supporting Jeb! Bush, then Marco rubio, then Ted Cruz, then John Kasich, before finally falling into line when Trump won the nomination. You could then infer that Trump was the absolute last choice but that they would still 'hold their nose' and vote for him in the general election, either due to loyalty to GOP on particular policy issues or because of some long-standing hatred of Hillary Clinton, or just a history of being very conformist in political matters (as many, many people are).


More often than not, this data is collected in the millions of phone calls and door-to-door visits conducted by volunteers.


I can not vouch for the accuracy of those. but as a power user of GOPDataCenter (The portal they provide to campaigns and GOP County chairs) the Modeled Ethnicity is pretty terrible.


Can confirm.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: