> It's impossible to know what information they will care about, what they think is in their best interests versus what actually is in their best interests by a more objective standard, etc.
Don't you think it's a little crazy to say that someone else can know what's in a persons' best interests by a more objective standard?
I feel like it's incredibly arrogant and belies a substantial lack of induction. You almost certainly believe that you know what's best for you. By induction we can conclude that everyone knows what's best for themselves, and that those who claim to know better are either charlatans or have a distinct lack of empathy.
Don't you think it's a little crazy to say that someone else can know what's in a persons' best interests by a more objective standard?
I feel like it's incredibly arrogant and belies a substantial lack of induction. You almost certainly believe that you know what's best for you. By induction we can conclude that everyone knows what's best for themselves, and that those who claim to know better are either charlatans or have a distinct lack of empathy.