No man, the bugs are open from long time. The team is no more, don't know why. Only the founder is doing commits from months. I had so much hopes on dgraph, it was way better than other graph dbs but immature

Could that be the nature of Github? Doesn't it give credit to whomever merges pull requests?

GitHub differentiates author and the one who committed if they are not same.

Well, that's unfortunate. DGraph seemed like it was pretty cool. I wish them the best of luck.

Dgraph released 1.0.6 and replication stopped working, I gave up on dgraph. It's just not reliable and immature. It's expected since there is only single developer making commits from months.

Dgraph has been bragging about being used by big companies. Jepsen test clearly shows that there were critical bugs and no sane company can use it in production as primary database, unless they don't care about their data.

Same could be said about almost every system tested by Jepsen, so your observation seems unfair.