If you see the usual percentage of brown M&Ms in the bowl, you can eat them while you wait for a full re-check of every power and weight item in a very long checklist, confident that somebody poured a bag into a bowl and left them unmolested except, maybe they ate a green one.
If the M&Ms are devoid of brown ones, you don't eat them because you know some peon was told to go through the bowl and take them out, and that sort of person will eat the brown ones and then go back in with their bare fingers for the next one, and thoroughly stir their fingers into the bowl looking for the last brown ones.
Now, if the M&Ms are carefully laid out in a series of monochromatic bowls, with no brown bowl in sight, it's probably safe to eat them because what sort of maniac would do that sorting without aid of a knife or spatula or something, right? But you shouldn't eat them because that's a work of art.
The comment history of this username really checks out!
I take zero offense and thank you for the correction, but it's somewhat amusing to think that someone presumably has two accounts and switches between them to make comments when a post is inadequately proofed.
Yes, I think the CapEx argument often advanced by the marketing of AWS and C-levels and engineers of large companies moving to the Cloud is just something said to justify the decision and help everybody get on board with it, but I think the CapEx -> OpEx one is fallacious.
There is others reasons for example the flexibility, the managed services, etc. but I don't think this one makes sense.
Sorry for the typo. I was just reading the thread on my mobile while walking, my clear mistake.
However it's obvious the well-meant on the thread above.
You are mistaken. Taiwan is 100% of Taiwan.