Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | oyster143's commentslogin

Seems cool, reminds me of this video where top GMs guess the position without seeing the pieces. Some can even name players and the date of the game.

https://youtu.be/_Ntn4jEv7rE?feature=shared


Learning basic variations of even one opening for white and for black can be extremely useful. There's not much tactics in first moves, but knowing how to set up a solid position will help a lot. Just learn basic stuff, no need to go into the weeds too much. Also the names of the openings are pretty cool


Just to add to the party: Microsoft deck for Nokia acquisition

https://www.slidebook.io/company/microsoft/presentation/f646...


That doesn't look like an internal presentation though.


Every time i re-read 'The Lord of the Rings' I'm amazed at how 'racist' it is in the literal sense of the word. Everything is built around races: the good characters are from the north/west, while the bad ones come from the south/east, etc.


And rather misogynist, and monarchist, and a boatload of other things.

Many of those I'd write off to Tolkien being a product of his times. At least his heroes seemed to have many ideals which are still accounted virtuous.

Tolkien's monarchism, though - even in the days of the Old Testament, it was obvious that hereditary monarchy never, ever worked for long. Because the heirs of great men always regressed to the mean. Pretty damn fast. (After King George III, Britain mostly solved that problem by turning their hereditary monarchs into mostly-symbolic figureheads.) And Tolkien served in the hellish trenches of WWI - a war which dug deep, dark graves for both hereditary monarchy and European superiority.

Hmm...in many ways, I could argue that Tolkien's fantasy writings were mostly escapism for him - to a old-fashioned romantic utopia, where "land of milk and honey, and the kingdom is powerful and prosperous, and the king is always good" was at least possible. And consider the massive decline in the real Britain's fortunes between Tolkien boyhood (~1900), and LOTR's publication (~1955)...


Monarchy never really works for long in Tolkien's works either. The history of the kings of Gondor is all strife and crises, and in Tolkien's abandoned sequel already 100 years later “the people of Gondor in times of peace, justice and prosperity, would become discontented and restless — while the dynasts descended from Aragorn would become just kings and governors — like Denethor or worse.” (Letter 256)


> consider the massive decline in the real Britain's fortunes between Tolkien boyhood (~1900), and LOTR's publication (~1955)...

Tolkien called conlang'ing (and by extension, worldbuilding?) "the solitary vice": a phrase which would have had a different denotation in his Edwardian childhood than the rather literal denotation we ascribe to it.

Lagniappe: https://www.reddit.com/r/conlangs/comments/8f425o/sex_in_you...

Exercise for the reader: how solarpunk would wider europe be now, if the British Empire and the German Empire (and their descendants) hadn't played Sith Master/Apprentice games, not once but twice, last century? (1914-1918 and 1939-1945)


Many of those I'd write off to Tolkien being a product of his times

Well, there are two products-of-their-time: the writer and the reader.


Since we readers are products of a time where we're incessantly propagandised (albeit more for economic than political ends), we ought to habitually be reading for both explicit text and implicit subtext.


Because the whole book is elvish propaganda.


Mordor: "[that] amazing city of alchemists and poets, mechanics and astronomers, philosophers and physicians, the heart of the only civilization in Middle-earth to bet on rational knowledge and bravely pitch its barely adolescent technology against ancient magic"


Yeah, I was thinking about that book[0])

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Ringbearer


Here are similar works, anyone have potential additions?

   Grendel
   The Persian Version
   Snow, Glass, Apples
(I have half a mind to write an epistolary short story from the point of view of one of Winston Smith's coworkers at the Ministry of Truth, dismayed about Smith's paranoiac reactions to normal office routine —colleagues transferring, etc.—, his labile personality[0] in general, and his conspiratorial mindset[1] in particular. All the objective events of Parts 1 and 2 can easily be explained much more rationally than in Smith's interpretations, but Part 3, being so explicit, has thus far resisted such treatment)

Lagniappe: "there can be no peace until they renounce their Rabbit God and accept our Duck God" https://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/141201_...

EDIT: also, Bulgakov's hard-boiled detective version of the gospel (his who-dun-it has a pragmatic advantage in that although christians and jews both still exist, no extant groups claim to belong to the Senatus PopulusQue Romanus)

[0] consider how quickly he hooked up with somone who merely dropped papers in front of him?

[1] want someone to kill people in a random pizzeria for conspiracy reasons? Smith's your man.


>short story from the point of view of one of Winston Smith's coworkers

I like the idea. I think the part 3 can co-exist the new interpretation of parts 1 and 2 -- Smith can be a conspiracy nut amid mundane reality but Big Brother's security apparatus nonetheless exists and for some reason eventually gets interested in Smith.


On the issue of how Tolkien thought about race in his works, Tolkien, Race, and Racism in Middle-earth, by Robert Stuart (2022) is very good. Despite its slightly clickbaity title, the author does a careful analysis and avoids polemic.


The northwest being Britain, the southeast being Germany. Such were the times.


If you use vpn for other purposes,its just a hustle to constantly switch it on and off.


They only need the share price to drop significantly in short term. I assume they can close their position pretty quickly depending on how market moves. Look at the Adani Group, share price has recovered significantly since Hindenburg report.


I use chat-gpt almost every day and find it very usefull


And how you gonna verify chat-gpt's result? By googling?


Good question actually.

There are a few options. I work with a REPL, so I usually load the answer from a scratch file and put some representative data into it. When the result is wrong, which often happens, I feed ChatGPT the error, and it corrects the code accordingly. Iterating this results in a working function about 80% of the time. Sometimes it loses the plot and I either give up or start over with more detailed instructions.

You can also ask it to write tests, some of which will pass, some of which will fail. It's pretty easy to eyeball whether or not a test is valid, and they won't always be valid, I just fix those by hand.


Yes.

Also, research isn't the only benefit, code generation, roleplay bots, are pretty good too.


Here's an example of some thing I tried at random a few weeks ago. I have a bunch of old hand written notes that are mind maps and graphs written on notebooks from 10+ years ago. I snapped a picture of all of the different graphs with my phone, threw them into chatGPT and asked it to convert them to mermaid UML syntax.

Every single one of them converted flawlessly when I brought them into my markdown note tool.

If you're using chatGPT as nothing more than a glorified fact checker and not taking advantage of the multimodal capabilities such as vision, OCR, Python VM, generative imagery, you're really missing the point.


It has provided sources and does internet lookups for a while now


Exactly how you would verify the result that your human underling yielded. You can even delegate the googling and summation to the AI and just verify the verification.


Competitors are catching up and one day the chat API providers will race the prices to bottom


That’s not the same thing as chat gpt being vaporware.


Eliminates that possibility in fact. You can't "catch up" to vaporware because there's nothing to catch up to.


Doesn't this apply to any product though?


Catching up to what they released a year ago. We don’t know what’s coming up next.


Yep, people who have a spare $1m to invest in Maltese passport, typically would have resources to hire a normal lawyer/ tax consultant


You will have to move though, in Malta you can just invest and get a passport


Exactly! The English speaking countries the parent mentions make it “easy” for young people to move there because they want more people to tax at their confiscatory tax rates. The goal of many people buying these other citizenships is to get them without having to become tax resident. Often they have residence visas or PR rights in other places.

For example if you’re an American with a Thailand elite visa good for 20 years or Singapore or Hong Kong PR you might want to get rid of your US passport but to do that practically you need another - literally any will do but these ppl don’t have an interest in becoming tax resident in another high tax place with complicated world wide reporting requirements…that’s literally the problem they are trying to solve by getting rid of the U.S. one.


Similar vibe, from a different perspectvie: pitch decks and presentations by failed companies.

https://www.slidebook.io/blog/article/on-the-road-to-failure...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: