Reads fine for me. I’m getting a bit worn out with the number of ‘if you’re going to use an LLM then take the time to …’ posts. I’ve looked at plenty of HN submissions that don’t render at all on mobile and yes I found it frustrating but didn’t just attribute it to an LLM.

Check the cards that are wrapped, along with the footer

Very well known Sky News reporter has is rarely used personal YouTube account blocked.

As usual for Google, very difficult to get a human in the loop to help.

Not sure but I'm interested in trying it because I've for a while sensed that adding SKILLS.md degraded my overall experience - most probably I wrote them wrong. But this sort of tooling I guess can help me figure it out?

Definitely, and this is something that needs more community support

Every AI vendor is trying to steal marketshare. For now the competition is good!

"home built auth system" is bound to have "random SSO issues". You fix them, that's how things mature.

Yep, it’s just a drag. It’s not our core product value so any effort we put into it is a drag.

> ... not being a core product

Technically true, because Google's core product is ads. Also fundamentally wrong, because Gmail serves as a massive source of ad targeting information, in addition to being a high-engagement canvas to display those ads.

Google has not been scanning gmail mails for ad targeting since 2017. I think after 9 years we can finally let that one go.

Ad display I'll still grant you of course.

I don't think we can let that one go so easily, since they might not be scanning for ad targeting (pinky promise?) - but they most certainly will slurp everything up for their AI stuff: https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/gmail/gm...

Sure, now it is.

It was an unproven long shot when they built it.

Supabase's auth is MIT licensed and OSS, is it not?

https://github.com/supabase/auth/blob/master/LICENSE

Supabase is OSS but it's a real pain to actually self host it

Couldn’t you get Claude to go into Supabase’s auth code and make your custom like their’s but adapted to your stack?

"Claude, make my custom like their's but adapted to my stack. Make no mistakes"

This is not funny because people are doing that for real.

You’ll have to drive the agent to do it, not a one-shot task. It’ll also require you to understand your codebase.

And don’t hallucinate.

I'm guessing they simply didnt want to spend the time and money doing that

Possibly didn’t want to accept the additional risk that comes with rolling your own auth as well.

Frankly, tough to have much sympathy. Yes it could happen to me or many of us too.

BUT

we’re expected to take precautions and from this article they clearly did not take ANY.

Pfft. Damage done, users know that Anthrophic will pull the rug from under them again if given half a chance. So yea, plan accordingly.

Offices are going out of fashion.. why name a product Office in 2026?

I don't think Musk has anything to do with Groq AI (his Grok model is from xAI)

Let the Bluewashing begin. Everything will be WebSphere-first and then WebSphere-only.