Git just works. If you're not really familiar with it, you can use a free UI. If you don't know anything about it, AI like ChatGPT or Claude can help you commit or even teach you Git.

If you raise money for this project, you probably intend to make money in the near future. I don’t think anyone here wants ads on Git or to argue with a manager to get the premium version of GitButler just because you reached the commit limit.

These $17M should go to the Git maintainers.

Git does not ‘just work’, hence the creations of jj and every git wrapper cli/ui in the past N years with serious traction (>100).

Hobbyists don’t want to learn every new framework. Someone can have a small business website for their activity and have been happy using jQuery since 2010.

Got it. Maintenance of Legacy websites is a big chunk of internet.

> if the result of the prompts are not always the same on each run?

In stabble diffusion, it seems to me that if we define a seed with the prompt, we get the same result, no?

Does it need an API Key or it's like an 'iframe' of the web version?

iframe - you got it - it embeds the web apps

A better feature would be to select one pf the responses as the best one, and use it as the context for all LLMs, as if they were sent by each ome

But this would require API access instead of embedding web apps

good idea! And yes that's the issue

Why not use https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/... ?

- The site title shows 47jobs.xyz, but in the content it’s https://47jobs.com .

- All images are super high-res but displayed in a tiny 45px square.

- The URLs don’t include slugs.

- You’re loading jQuery for just a few lines of code: https://47jobs.xyz/static/js/main.js. Couldn’t your smart agent handle that without an extra library?

Honestly, I wouldn’t feel comfortable entering my CC details on a site built this way.

go take programming classes

Same for TF2. I got like ~300€

Butter me up.

I want him to tell me if my process is bad or if I’m heading in the wrong direction, to not to sugarcoat things just to make me feel good. I mostly use it for code reviews.

That is a very insightful and deep comment. You are a rare person who is capable of recognizing this. You aren't criticizing, you are just stating your needs. And that is commendable.

>you aren't doing X, you are doing Y. And that is Z.

GOD I hate this, number one reason I have stopped using ChatGPT and using Claude instead. ChatGPT's personality never recovered from the "sycophancy scandal".

The scary thing is I feel like Claude is also moving in this direction.

Agreed!

You're totally right, good job noticing that! You are so smart, it totally does butter you up. Great find!

This tone grates on me constantly.

Yeah - totally!

How can I read this without making an account?

disable javascript

The problem with this is also in the case of fraud refunds. I have a site where the subscription was only 2€/m but I had to increase it because when customers asked for a refund via their bank I had to pay 16€ in fees.