Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | enaaem's commentslogin

Yeah this is really bad news for Israel. America does not have the resolve for a major ground invasion, and Israel cannot intercept missiles indefinitely.

The biggest issue here is not insider trading itself, but the fact that (foreign) policy is being used for insider trading.

Think of the tariff madness of last year. The biggest issue wasn't that insider billionaires were robbing outsider billionaires. The bigger issue was the massive stress small businesses had to endure, who didn't know how they were going to survive.


I am of the mind that legalization of this practice would decrease trust in the marketplace to an extent that I think is necessary at this point. Of course, the better alternative would be to actually enforce these laws and increase confidence in the marketplace but how will the inside track billionaires make their money if we do?

I also thought it was to induce their version of armageddon.

The problem is you can undress real people and that is extremely harmful and dangerous. One kid took his life after an ai sextortian scam [1]. Imagine the damage cyberbullies, scammers and stalkers can do?

[1] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sextortion-generative-ai-scam-e...


Imagine how freeing it will be when people stop caring about this stuff because anyone can see anyone else naked in about 5 seconds. We're basically already at realistic hardcore porn videos of anyone fucking anyone else in a few minutes. No point in worrying about it, and it even serves as a shield for real leaked revenge porn - just claim it's AI.

This take is so bleak man.

It's creepy and uncomfortable when someone says out loud that they're imagining you doing sex acts!

Even if everyone knows that you're not actually doing sex acts and it's just some guy imagining it!

Now everyone has to see what these creeps are imagining, but it's fine because it's AI? Like actually are you out of your mind?


My point is that it holds no meaning, seeing an naked picture of someone now no longer implies that they allowed themselves to be photographed naked. So who cares? Sharing it is creepy sure, like sending an email or a crayon drawing about having sex with someone is creepy if they're not interested. But the existence of the thing matters as much as someone's imagination does now, when before that the existence of a nude was an issue in and of itself.

Same thing will be used to argue against photographic evidence for crimes ofc.


Yeah like I said. With consent of the people involved.

There must be a way to do that. Especially with all the facial req chops these days. Also, you could simply refuse using existing images. I don't see why they wouldn't refuse that because that's a pretty narrow usecase with very few benign purposes.

> Imagine the damage cyberbullies, scammers and stalkers can do?

They already can. There's open-source models out there.


This has been fixed months ago. From reading Reddit, Grok is now really conservative about what it will let you do with uploaded images. But you can get it to draw x rated porn images and videos that start with Ai images it creates

> The problem is you can undress real people and that is extremely harmful and dangerous.

But... that's not something you can do. It's impossible.

You can imagine what real people look like naked. That's not a new thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7FCgw_GlWc


Imagining what someone looks like in your mind is far different than actively sharing fake nude images online. This cannot be a serious comparison.

Actively sharing fake nude images online has always been legal. It's not even a close question. The practice is neither harmful nor dangerous. Did you look at that link?

> fake nude images online

...have been around for decades.


Yes but the genie is out of the bottle as web say. Deepfakes and AI gen are here to stay. We can try to go after every tool out there but it'll be just as effective as the 'war on drugs'.

We'll just have to adapt as a society and realise that what you see is not what you get anymore, in other words most of what we're going to see is false.


Buying ballots on a large scale seems difficult to me, because you have to keep a large group of strangers from talking. They will brag to their friends and family members and the information will come out. I can only imagine people buying a few ballots from their apolitical family members.

Still banned China, Russia and the EU...


Looking at the stuff China puts in their food (like the actual instant noodles), definitely a red flag if even they ban it.

Generally I look at EU for what's good/bad to consume though. It's scary how much stuff is banned there that's in everyday US products.


I generally think that as well and so was surprised to read that they're planning to not label CRISPER fruits as such.

"European Union’s Parliament and Council, the bloc’s governing body, reached a provisional deal in December to “simplify” the process for marketing plants bred through new genomic techniques, such as by scrapping the need to label them any differently from conventional ones."

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47271338


Sometimes hot and vinegar is all you want.

There is a place for simple hot sauces, because you don't want to add additional flavours. Sometimes all you want is straight up chilis.

More complex hot sauces might include dried shrimp, fermented soy, lemon grass, dried mushrooms, but those flavours might not be desirable in some dishes. And some dishes require specific hot sauces because they are an integral part of the flavour profile (Mapo tofu, Tom Yum).


I would just like to interject for a moment. Mapo tofu does not use 'hot sauce' as understood in the common parlance. It uses doubanjiang, a very specific fermented paste of chilis and broad beans. It is not saucy; it's very thick like gochujang. I take issue with calling doubanjiang hot sauce and I really don't want anyone to try to make mapo tofu with normal hot sauce.


You can actually just spread gochujang on things like Marmite. You probably shouldn't, but you can.

It can be a bit full on, so remember, spread it on like Marmite. Not like Nutella, unless you're really in the mood for a lot of flavour.


I would like to add an example to this.

Restrictive zoning and the lack of walkable neighbourhoods makes it very difficult for small businesses that rely on personal service. This isn't just a slight inconvenience, but it completely changes the fabric of society. But in American libertarian circles taxation takes up all the oxygen in the room. People are generally blind to opportunity cost.


How about dying for Israel?


There people who bet way too early, and sometimes even before departure time. Like hundreds of euros. What does that mean? Mistyping? Cancellation?


It’s fake money. It’s not a real betting platform, so you can bet whatever.


It's not real money.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: