The difference between HW4 and older Teslas (before 2023) is night and day. HW4 absolutely can handle 99.9% or more of driving now whereas the older models drive like an idiot. I've never had to intervene on HW4 yet. It did well avoiding debris and animals, even seeing them heading towards the road. Worked well in heavy rain and snowstorms, even when lanes were barely visible. Handled moving and parked emergency vehicles with lights on correctly. Navigated through roads undergoing work (lanes shifted, closed off, pylons everywhere). Automatic parking actually works but not all the time yet.
No software update is going to give working FSD to all those older models on the road. I don't think they can even have HW4 retrofitted either. Ideally FSD would be disabled on those cars because it's confirmed never going to work properly but people paid for lifetime FSD on them (newer cars are subscription only).
Even if 99.9% is true (and there’s no reason to think it is), that’s nowhere near reliable enough to match Waymo or do truly autonomous driving. The average human is much better than 99.9%.
That's just me being pessimistic because I've seen how terrible FSD is on older Teslas, and only have personal experience using it in HW4 for ~2 months.
It's really unfortunate that FSD is judged as a singular feature when it is vastly different depending on the car. HW3 cars are getting cut down versions of FSD software, which is useless garbage because it drives like an idiot. HW2 and earlier are probably not getting FSD updates at all anymore. The majority of Teslas on the road are HW3 or earlier, run significantly worse (unsafe) FSD versions, and yet Tesla still allows it to be turned on.
> Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action.
You'd need to say something which directs others to violate the law or commit acts of violence, at a specific time ("imminent"), and your statement must be likely to be effective at causing them to do so.
Protesting, encouraging others to protest, expressing your political beliefs, organizing a protest, etc. are not incitement to violence. Nor is "doxxing" (filming, identifying) a public employee. None of these activities satisfy those criteria.
Remember the "Twitter files" nonsense? I recall they were upset at the government influencing the expression of political views on social media. Not hearing much backlash about this from the same people, because this is what they were claiming, but 100x worse.
Exactly. "Department of War" is guidance that applies only to Federal employees, and the Department of Defense was named through Congressional legislation. That is still the department's name, whatever Trump decrees.
Fun fact: The Department of Defense was named through legislation.
Trump's EO that "renames" it only applies to Federal employees as guidance. No one else needs to call it that, and it's still legally the Department of Defense.
It was well-litigated by the Trump administration, and none of their frivolous claims held up. They lost ~60 of their 63 court cases, and the 3 they won were technicalities.
It might be worth writing a privacy policy to this effect. It would then be worth examining the claim; for example, could this information be found in request logs? You know and trust your intentions but strangers do not.
Seriously. Who is going to buy another Futurehome product knowing that they feel entitled to extort their customers, whose only alternative is to remove the devices integrated into their home?
Also, I guarantee you FSD would recognize a mattress as an obstruction.
reply