I remember Intel MBP 16" suffered VRM overheat and the method that transfer heat to bottom shell case by attaching thermal pad was there too.

Sometime Apple intentionally ignores engineering problems when they want to push some product design aspects.

On the other hand I see a very hot bottom case as an engineering problem that Apple solved by not using a thermal pad. Sometimes higher clock speeds don't really mean much for the user experience. For example I can set my gaming laptop to run in eco mode, or turbo mode, and the performance with simple tasks like web browsing is roughly the same. In these sorts of situations, its better to let the chip slow down a bit to preserve my thighs.

The problem was mbp retail product couldn't provide performance processor can do. I am not saying they needed to apply thermal pad to transfer heat via bottom case. They should provide proper VRM cooling solution at that time.

actually, the throttle people suffered also can interfere normal use-case not only for power hogging scenario.

I got weezered by Raymond. what is going on?

god damn, I've never though Qt app could be this smooth and looking nice.

> $250 for a version with updates past a year? yikes It cannot handle CJK encodings too. what a joke

Explorer file browser is just disaster. I am forced to use third-party browsing app when the directory contains hundreds of media.

It has happened since win7 or older but still not fixed.

try windhawk. it is awesome tweak for mac-os-wannabe windows 11.

still m1 family is the only one that fully(not acutally) supported apple silicon by asahi? I have m1 pro macbook pro btw

unfiltered NSFW ads, false game ads and false DMCA takedowns

but legitimate DMCA inquery rejected. just lol.

> consistent from a UX perspective

It changes its height dynamically by state of each shell extensions. how come it is consistent from a UX perspective.

> There just is not many willing to work on a shoe string salary.

You explained it well by yourself.