Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | deaconblues's commentslogin

No, definitely not. But you could certainly get a few others together, start a band, play some gigs, maybe even make a little bit of money.


Thank you. I was reprimanded once for essentially "only" being at the office for the defined time we agreed I would be there. I spent some time racking my brain until I decided I wasn't being unreasonable.


There is this hyaundai commercial ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ8Klm8vPlI ) that hits home for me. "When did leaving work on time become an act of courage". It's so true.


I've always found it humorous that the clock hits 6:00 rather than 5:00. "Leaving work on time is an act of courage, but let's not get crazy!" Presumably he courageously started at 10:00 or took an hour away from work for lunch.


It's more about the appearance of working vs actually having work to do. I used to come in at 7:30 and leave at 4:30 because my commute was terrible other wise (2 hours each way). The few nights I stayed until 6-7pm I noticed the engineers that came in at 10-11am were all gone by 5:30pm but to most managers it looked like they were "working harder" than me when I left at 4:30.


Where I worked, official hours are 8.30 to 6. In Asia of course.


Is the official work week 47.5 hours?

In the U.S., while I think it's true that people tend to work closer to 50 hours, we pay lip service to the "40 hour work week".


Unreasonable employers happen. You have a variety of options including try to convince them to be reasonable, accede to their demands, try to be sneakier, or find a new job.

In our industry where it tends to be an option for us, "find a new job" might make sense.


I was wondering the other day: is it possible to enjoy coding, be good and employable, and still leave your work at work? I code at home too, but yeah, other passions take priority. You rarely hear about programmers who don't live and breathe code, but there must be a huge number of them.


Yes!

If you hang around HN or the trendy hipster blogosphere, then no. Seems those developers are the scum of the earth and shouldn't be allowed near a computer, but in the real world, those are the ones doing important development in medicine, banking, military, etc, while keeping normal work hours. Just because they don't create the 389th Javascript frontend MVC fully reactive template based framework and create 50 blog posts about it, doesn't mean they aren't good at their jobs.


80/20 principle probably applies.

I've known lots of programmers who turn up, do a good job then go home, they don't blog, follow frameworks or languages or any of the other stuff that isn't directly required for work.


Hi, deaconblues. I'm guy who write this article. I can't speak for anybody but myself, but developers who don't live and breathe code probably don't work in the major tech hubs or for startups.

I'm a contractor who does a hell of a lot of work for state governments. An NDA precludes my naming names, but I work in a Microsoft shop and I've spent the last year helping reverse-engineer a legacy system implemented in COBOL than ran on an IBM mainframe.

It isn't sexy work, but somebody has to do it. Why not mercenaries with bad attitudes like me? :)


Yes. Actually most programmers I work with seem to be 9-5ers without any passion. I am a 9-5er with some passion about the languages and tools I use.


I guess I'd just like the distinction that not living and breathing code doesn't equal a lack of passion. I'm passionate about programming. Can't say I ever was about washing dishes. They were both jobs, though, and when I get off work, there are other things I want to do.


There are other things outside of work that I am more passionate about. But programming can be interesting, and pays the bills.


This is truly one of the coolest things I've seen in a while. I can't help but think of the little Atari Portfolio John Connor has in Terminator 2.


> I can't help but think of the little Atari Portfolio John Connor has in Terminator 2.

Late eighties/early nineties seemed like an interesting period for these sort of handheld computers. Another great example is the HP LX series, eg 95LX or 200LX http://i.imgur.com/pHa8YWD.jpg


Also this little sony thing from late 90s:

http://www.apj.co.uk/technology/apple_sony_clie.htm


I finally understand that funny feeling every time I carry a computer in my backpack. That exact scene. Thanks a lot.


That scene had a pretty big impact on me as a kid. Here was a movie with time traveling assassin robots, but that scene always seemed totally believable and possible. I think about it a lot, for whatever reason.


I upgraded my Portfolio by duct-taping an rPi to it. :)


I played for a minute or two, said "Huh," and closed the tab. Sure feels like I won.


Indeed! Only losers need a machine to tell them that they are winners.


What did you win?


Did he win not losing? I played this for 6-7 minutes and can no longer do anything but cower in the horribly glorious splendor of the God of recursion. I can feel my mind draining out through my tear ducts.


'My $0.02' - For when 'IMHO' isn't enough.


And the 2008 animated Disney movie: http://movies.disney.com/bolt


Great, thanks! Nodemailer has been very useful.


Seems neat, and I appreciate the forward-thinking mentality. But, as far as I am aware, emoji are a fad and won't really stand the test of time anyway. Either way, I guess, it's nice to see these easy-to-use, easy-to-create principals in play.


Emoji aren't going anywhere. They've been around in Japan for over a decade and have been enshrined forever in Unicode 6.


I thought so too, until I started using them in my messages to my friends and girlfriend. Now I find them an integral part of my communications. 😄


Oh the irony. Your emoji comes out as a blank square for me (Windows 7 - Opera 12)


Chrome does the blank square as well, but it works in Firefox and IE. (win7)


Works for me in FF on Linux.


Consider installing the Symbola font [1]. Where Unicode fallback works correctly, missing glyphs from the regular site font will be taken from Symbola. It's the most comprehensive freely available emoji font I could find (although it doesn't look anywhere as good as full color emojis and at average website font sizes can render a little too small to make out any detail).

[1] http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/


Looks good here, IE11 on Windows 8.1


Opera 12 on Debian GNU/Linux shows it fine


A few seem to be really missing the point of this article, which has little to do with emoji itself. TLDR; MS's approach to implementing a color emoji font could lead to a very useable color font format.

EDIT: typos


I think I addressed that in my comment. The article is a little about emoji, and I addressed that too.


I believe a copy of that book came with my Gamecube preorder, all those years ago. It's a great book, easy to read, very interesting.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: