Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Guereric's commentslogin

Any tips on using old reddit on a phone? Constantly zooming in to press unfriendly-for-tap buttons make it a chore, compared to Apollo.


That’s the way.

The alternative is the god awful updated site or their app. I hope you like adverts.


There could be a userscript for a better reddit UI if someone cared but looks like nobody does. There's also Reddit Enhancement Suite but I don't think you can use it on mobile.


I use Hckrnews.com, which is convenient on my phone and allows me to filter posts in order to be focused with my time.


Score of 0 in western Canada under Telus.


I found extra information for those curious about statistics involving human heart transplantation [1]:

"The most recent data of the registry of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation indicates a current 1-year survival of 84.5% and a 5-year survival of 72.5%. This has significantly improved as compared to the 76.9% 1-year survival and 62.7% 5-year survival in the 1980s. The development of new immunosuppressive drugs which allow a variety of immunosuppressive regimens, tailored to the individual patient, has contributed to this success, since rejection and the adverse effects of immunosuppression could be better controlled. After 20 years, ca. 21% of patients are still alive, according to the international registry. In some experienced centers, long-term survival is reported to be even higher. The University Hospital Zurich has achieved a 20-year survival rate of 55.6%.

The improvement in outcome over the decades is related mainly to an increase in survival over the first year. After this period, the attrition rate of ca. 3-4% per year has remained similar over the different eras. This might be attributable to the fact that it was not possible to reduce the incidence of long-term complications after heart transplantation, such as chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and malignancies, which account for ca. 35% of all deaths after 10 to 15 years."

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC4387387/


Doesn't retrograde imply that the procedure goes up the colon?


Failed for this article


You have to go to the site and paste in the url you want to see.

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles...


On every thread with a paywalled site, I appreciate the kindness you show by linking an archive copy.


I am flabbergasted that this author attributed to 9to5 mac the privacy labels of different apps in the screenshot, when tracing the sources shows it was Zak Doffman at Forbes who created it. Poor journalism.



Is twitter ever a better link?


Everything relevant to the reader is captured by the twitter post of the developer. What does macrumours, or the verge from an earlier post, add?


Twitter recently completely blocked js-free viewing, it's never ideal.


I just read the tweet with a text-only browser that does not process javascript, using an "approved" User-Agent string.


Really? Until a few months ago I used to visit twitter links in FF w/noscript blocking js, it would just divert me to "classic" mode.

This is what happens currently in FF:

https://pengaru.com/~vc/tmp/twitter.png

Maybe they've stopped supporting my version of FireFox on Linux, and I've wrongly assumed it's strictly the lack of js? I'm not sure if that's any better... since this browser is perfectly capable of everything needed to view tweets.


I never used a popular browser to read tweets in the past. I was using mobile.twitter.com leading up to this change; this is no longer possible. AFAICT what has changed is that they are requiring an "approved" user-agent string. Someone here on HN tried Googlebot and it worked. I just tested it and it is still working. There are other strings that work. You definitely do not need javascript to read Twitter.


> Someone here on HN tried Googlebot and it worked. I just tested it and it is still working

Was there an HN thread regarding this change that I missed?



Thanks


I got the Pfizer vaccine in Alberta, Canada. Our vaccine FAQ says that getting the second injection 21d to 28d after the first is recommended. Up to 3 months after is allowed, but not advised. For delays longer than 3 months, the person simply won't get the second dose.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: