Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2011-11-13login
Stories from November 13, 2011
Go back a day, month, or year. Go forward a day, month, or year.
1.List of freely available programming books (stackoverflow.com)
364 points by parallel on Nov 13, 2011 | 28 comments
2.Oppenheimer's recommendation letter for Richard Feynman (lettersofnote.com)
293 points by sindhiparsani on Nov 13, 2011 | 78 comments
3.Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA (reddit.com)
242 points by pbj on Nov 13, 2011 | 62 comments
4.Generation Sell (nytimes.com)
206 points by robg on Nov 13, 2011 | 70 comments

The founders of Diaspora were in a really unenviable position. They started off with a wave of national press as well as solid financial support from grassroot users. As time went on, it became increasingly clear that they would not be able to accomplish the goal they originally set out to do. They had failed. Publicly. This can be very devastating psychologically to someone who has always 'succeeded' in life.

I'm not saying this was the case for Ilya, or had any part in his death, but I know for me it would have been hard to swallow. There are many silent founders out there that gave up everything for an unrealized dream in the path to startup success and it has a real toll on psyches.

Best wishes to his family & friends.

EDIT: This appears to be a very controversial comment. The vote count seems to be oscillating up and down very rapidly. I don't want to make this out to be a discussion about Diaspora, so I won't comment further on that point. But the mental health of founders is a real issue and rarely discussed. Maybe there should be a more open discussion about this issue.

6.PragDave: I'm on vacation, and I've deleted your message—really (pragprog.com)
170 points by queensnake on Nov 13, 2011 | 72 comments
7.Think different about Jobs (cridland.net)
159 points by andyking on Nov 13, 2011 | 193 comments
8.Translating mathematics into code (might.net)
150 points by edsrzf on Nov 13, 2011 | 11 comments
9.How Google Inflates AdWords Bids (plus.google.com)
147 points by veesahni on Nov 13, 2011 | 50 comments
10.Europe's Web Of Debt (nytimes.com)
142 points by arunabh on Nov 13, 2011 | 127 comments
11."No matter what price we choose, we always make the same revenue" (plus.google.com)
142 points by inflatablenerd on Nov 13, 2011 | 71 comments
12.6th Grade iPhone Developer speaks at TEDx (thenextweb.com)
139 points by mbesto on Nov 13, 2011 | 54 comments
13.Portrait of a N00b (steve-yegge.blogspot.com)
124 points by nyellin on Nov 13, 2011 | 67 comments
14.The Real Cost of Patent Trolls: $80B/year (bu.edu)
120 points by dpe82 on Nov 13, 2011 | 10 comments
15.The IOCCC is back (ioccc.org)
116 points by lordgilman on Nov 13, 2011 | 15 comments
16.Paul Dirac: The unsung genius (bbc.co.uk)
112 points by twidlit on Nov 13, 2011 | 27 comments
17.An experiment mimicking the Dock of OS X using only CSS (michaelhue.com)
108 points by js4all on Nov 13, 2011 | 39 comments
18.WhatsApp bucks convention, quietly builds a messaging titan (gigaom.com)
90 points by jasonmcalacanis on Nov 13, 2011 | 38 comments
19.Innovation is almost entirely absent (post-gazette.com)
88 points by edw519 on Nov 13, 2011 | 21 comments
20.PragDave: Followup on the EMail Experiment (pragprog.com)
82 points by bradly on Nov 13, 2011 | 27 comments
21.Why do Programmers get paid less than Project Managers or Business Analysts? (dodgycoder.net)
73 points by damian2000 on Nov 13, 2011 | 71 comments
22.Archive.org: Scanning a Braille Playboy (archive.org)
72 points by tripzilch on Nov 13, 2011 | 8 comments
23.497.1-day uptime bug (ibm.com)
70 points by mrb on Nov 13, 2011 | 22 comments
24.Travis CI keeps getting better: Now supports multiple PHP versions (travis-ci.org)
70 points by cookiestack on Nov 13, 2011 | 7 comments
25.Perhaps The Copyright Industry Deserves Some Credit (torrentfreak.com)
69 points by llambda on Nov 13, 2011 | 16 comments
26.Remarkable Trio of Young, African-American Chess Masters (nytimes.com)
68 points by OstiaAntica on Nov 13, 2011 | 23 comments

Isaacson's book is a hatchet job, with many errors, and some downright dishonest statements. It is a shame that Jobs cooperated with that hack.

In numerous passages, Isaacson will quote Jobs saying something perfectly truthful[1], and then follow it up with a claim that Jobs is lying. Most of the time, he doesn't provide any evidence that Jobs is lying, just the assertion, because, as Isaacson is careful to tell us many times in the book, Jobs is famous for his "reality distortion field". I guess this means that Isaacson doesn't have to back up his assertions, and of course Steve Jobs isn't around to defend himself.

One example of this is Jobs talking about how NeXT's software gave the Mac new life. Isaacson says this is a lie, and then goes on to quote Bill Gates who says none of the NeXT code made it into OS X. Now, this is an obvious and bald faced lie on Gates' part, but Isaacson doesn't know any better. He's decided that Jobs is a liar, and therefore , whenever someone says anything that disagrees, it must be evidence that Jobs was lying.

Reality is, OS X is NeXTSTEP with the Mac UI put on top of it, and at this point another 10 years of evolution. Gates was lying for whatever reasons Gates lies (and gates really is pathological in this regard).

Another example is how he treats the statements of Alvy Ray Smith. One of the really nice things about the PBS show on Jobs a few weeks ago was getting to see Alvy. He's clearly disgruntled. And this makes sense, given the extreme difficulties Pixar had in the early years before they were able to start doing features. As a result, as the company kept needing money, and since they couldn't' get outside Capital, they kept using Jobs' capital, and other founders would get diluted as Jobs would buy more and more shares by putting more and more money into it to keep it afloat. In Isaacson's book, however, this isn't really explained, and it comes off as if Jobs was ripping off the others. Isaacson takes Alvy at face value.... but doesn't seem to ask Catmull or others about it.

This makes Isaacson a sucker for anyone who has any "dirt" on Jobs, and he clearly didn't ask Steve about many of these claims (or if he did, he didn't put Steve's response in the book.)

The book is an excellent piece of propaganda. It pretends to glorify someone who it is obvious the public recognizes as a major positive impact on society, while subtly and at every turn, engaging in character assassination.

For the past 30 years, I've seen constant repetition of lies about Apple. I'm not really surprised to see Isaacson do a hatchet job-- as every other book about Jobs has been one as well. His is a little more classy, but a hatchet job none the less.

If you think you've got nothing to learn form Steve Jobs, or that he was a bad guy, well, that reflects a lot more on you than on him.

It's sad that, now that he's died, it seems the haters-- all of whom seem to be completely ignorant about the history of Apple and constantly repeating the same mindless party line-- feel that they are free to keep posting these bullshit stories and voting them up.

Its time to stop. I know you kids think its cool to bash Steve Jobs because "android android derp derp derp!" but this is Hacker News. This is the site for technology enthusiasts who want to do Startups. If you don't respect Steve Jobs for taking a garage startup all the way to being larger than Exxon Mobile in 30 years, by doing a small number of products exceedingly well, I don't think you should be hanging out here.

[1] I've had Apple products for 25+ years. I've been following the company for that long and have met a fair number of their executives over the years and a lot of Apple employees. I'm extremely well versed in all things Apple, to the point that I caught many innocent errors in the book. There are things I don't know about, of course, such as current plans, and things Jobs said that were private. But when I say "something perfectly truthful", I mean, the statement is something I know to be a fact from an independant source (not Steve Jobs) and it is at least a fair statement of the facts (leaving room for some of the statements being opinions. On at least one occasion, Isaacson calls an opinion a lie.)


Horrible. This news is so tragic I really can't focus on anything else now. Which is probably the way it should be.

Our community stresses the importance of achievement, success, and technology so much that it's easy to forget what's really most important: each other. Sometimes it takes terrible news like this to jerk us back to that reality.

I never knew Ilya, but if any of his friends of family visits this forum, please know that many thoughts and prayers are with you.

I have no idea what was behind this, so just a few (possibly related) thoughts:

- Let's never forget that everything we do is for other people. They outrank all the ones and zeros. Go hug someone important to you.

- If you ever believe the possibility of something like happening is > .00001, do something, anything. If you don't know what to do, contact me (see my profile) and I'll help in any way I can. Nothing can be more important.

- This was the ultimate failure. I'm so sorry to hear this and hope that Ilya's family and friends somehow find peace.


So, so many excellent quotes in that discussion. My favorite:

"Kids are never the problem. They are born scientists. The problem is always the adults. The beat the curiosity out of the kids. They out-number kids. They vote. They wield resources. That's why my public focus is primarily adults."

Preach it, dude.


Very important comment. The biggest risk in doing a startup is not the financial risk per se.

It's the psychological risk of knowing you really, really tried -- and still failed. That is the hard part, because everyone goes in with Dilbert/mass media notions of how easy it is to be a CEO or (just as bad) Social Network illusions of how easy it is to grow meteorically while fighting off lawsuits.

The truth is that it's not easy, that it takes a special and lucky person. If you fail it's really hard to realize you aren't that special. The possibly healthier (?) way of dealing is to convince yourself that it was bad luck, or the other guy cheated. Then it's not as much of a hit to the ego, to the sense of your own capabilities. But it's hard.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: